Sunday, August 06, 2006
I'm Trying To Write A Diary Here (2)
While waiting for my associates to start tagging in order that I may have some debatably and reasonably meaningful, if not inconsequentially random but psycologically-based, topics, I shall attempt to actually start writing some of these debatle and reasonably meaningful, if not inconsequentially random but psycologically-based, topics.
Eg. Why we want to write this kind of debatably and reasonably meaningful, if not inconsquentially... topics.
I shall first proceed to explain why this is debatably and reasonably meaningful ... -based. The reason why it is debatably meaningful is due to the fact that we do not know exactly why we would want to know why this should be meaningful at all, which is why we are debating it at all, and because now we know that it is arguably meaningful is because we actually care to argue about it, therefore it is followed that it is reasonably meaningful. However, in view of the fact that a human has limited time on earth and thus should not squander away this treasure on debating about why we argue about something's meaningfulness, since we would have to debate about a debate, and thus might not get down to the real issue at all and spend infinity debating about this debate, it follows that this article might actually be random, which is defined as something that pops into nowhere out of nowhere, and has no linkage to anywhere at all (which is theoretically impossible, since nowhere is in itself somewhere, and thus classified as anywhere). Why we might want something random in exchange for something meaningful (bearing in mind that this is meaningful and proven so - refer to above) is questionable. Perhaps it is related to the whole meaning of meaningfulness. Perhaps meaningfulness might mean that something means a lot to us, however since significance is of perspective as is thus relative, and according to Albert Einstein's general theory of relativity, that everything and everyone in this universe is related, then what means a lot to us is related to the universe, and when put in universal perspective is not meaningful at all due to the negligible meaningfulness of it all, and so meaningfulness is meaningless. Having established this, it can then be said that randomness, which is nothing, since it of nothing, can be said to mean everything, since everything is nothing. I shall decline to comment on why this is considered psycologically-based as in doing so, I might insult some people's intellect by suggesting that they cannot see the obvious obviousness of it all (which is, by the way, another debatly and reasonably meaningful, if not inconsequentially random but psycologically-based topic).
Having explained why the topic of why we should write debatably and reasonably meaningful, if not inconsequentially random but psycologically-based topics is debatly and reasonably meaningful, if not inconsequentially random but psycologically-based, I believe myself to have answered this very question in my explanation of the above problem.
My brain hurts.
Eg. Why we want to write this kind of debatably and reasonably meaningful, if not inconsquentially... topics.
I shall first proceed to explain why this is debatably and reasonably meaningful ... -based. The reason why it is debatably meaningful is due to the fact that we do not know exactly why we would want to know why this should be meaningful at all, which is why we are debating it at all, and because now we know that it is arguably meaningful is because we actually care to argue about it, therefore it is followed that it is reasonably meaningful. However, in view of the fact that a human has limited time on earth and thus should not squander away this treasure on debating about why we argue about something's meaningfulness, since we would have to debate about a debate, and thus might not get down to the real issue at all and spend infinity debating about this debate, it follows that this article might actually be random, which is defined as something that pops into nowhere out of nowhere, and has no linkage to anywhere at all (which is theoretically impossible, since nowhere is in itself somewhere, and thus classified as anywhere). Why we might want something random in exchange for something meaningful (bearing in mind that this is meaningful and proven so - refer to above) is questionable. Perhaps it is related to the whole meaning of meaningfulness. Perhaps meaningfulness might mean that something means a lot to us, however since significance is of perspective as is thus relative, and according to Albert Einstein's general theory of relativity, that everything and everyone in this universe is related, then what means a lot to us is related to the universe, and when put in universal perspective is not meaningful at all due to the negligible meaningfulness of it all, and so meaningfulness is meaningless. Having established this, it can then be said that randomness, which is nothing, since it of nothing, can be said to mean everything, since everything is nothing. I shall decline to comment on why this is considered psycologically-based as in doing so, I might insult some people's intellect by suggesting that they cannot see the obvious obviousness of it all (which is, by the way, another debatly and reasonably meaningful, if not inconsequentially random but psycologically-based topic).
Having explained why the topic of why we should write debatably and reasonably meaningful, if not inconsequentially random but psycologically-based topics is debatly and reasonably meaningful, if not inconsequentially random but psycologically-based, I believe myself to have answered this very question in my explanation of the above problem.
My brain hurts.
-+Darkening Dawn+-dreamingat >>1:01 AM